Apple can not stop programmers from offering third party payments that avoid the fees it charges for in-app purchases, according to the ruling of the judge in the Epic vs Apple case that has been delivered right after several months of deliberations.   Apple can not stop programmers from including external hyperlinks that direct customers in order to purchasing mechanisms in addition to in-app purchasing, and developers may also communicate with customers through points of contact obtained under your own accord from customers through account registration.

This past year, Epic updated the Fortnite add with its own in-app payment system, bypassing Apple, and it was then removed from the App Store for violating its policies. This resulted in the antitrust lawsuit through Epic. A similar case can also be set to take place against Google .

According to the injunction   published by The particular Verge ,   the particular court did not find Apple to be a monopolist, and as noted in Process , Apple has surfaced from the ruling largely unscathed, but with one of the central App-store policies banned. It does not appear to require Apple to straight allow other forms of transaction, but developers can url to websites with cheaper offers, or the same price without having to pay Apple its costs.

This reasoning comes soon after  Epic Games inquired Apple to bring back the Fortnite developer account and for the  re-release from the game on iOS within South Korea, offering each Epic and Apple transaction, which Apple quickly rebuffed .

The ruling may be the result of years long battle between Apple and Legendary Games, the creators of Fortnite, and the fees charged by Apple on in-app purchases. Epic had characterized this as an unfair, monopolistic tax.  

Over the course of the trial, which kicked away from in May ,   Assess Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers questioned Apple CEO Tim  Prepare, and said  the profits Apple reaps from game programmers ” appear to be disproportionate . ” Cook replied that  Apple’s online industry would become a toxic  mess without control .

App-store Can Not Ban Alternative Obligations, Judge Rules in Legendary vs Apple